ListArc » English » Miscellaneous » Mooney » Ray+jay+turbo+vs+m20+turbo


Ray+jay+turbo+vs+m20...


05-10-2010 08:55 AM
1


Hi
Any feedback on turbo normalizers that have been placed on the 4 bangers
for the E,F, or 201?
Heard that the 6 cylinder engines were made for the turbo and many
problems have occurred with
trying to put them on the 4 cylinder engines.
Also heard that they Ray Jay turbo is more problematic then the newer
turbo made for mooneys (m20 turbo)?
Thanks!
Craig

)


05-10-2010 02:15 PM
2


Joe,

It was not my intention to suggest HOW to fly the airplane, just that it was extra cost and complexity unless you DO fly over 10K on a regular basis. If the original poster plans on flying above 10K regularly, then by all means he should get a turbo or turbo-normalized airplane, regardless of where in the country that flying is done. But, as you well know, below 10K, the turbo doesn't do much for performance and adds a lot of cost and complexity that may not be needed if he is not planning on going to oxygen altitudes routinely.

I'm all for flying higher to get above the weather and traffic and turbulence, or to get better true airspeeds, etc. However, I hate the cannulae (cannuluses?), so I don't generally get above 10K unless in something pressurized. Again, no implication meant, just a suggestion to look at projected use of the airplane before taking the turbo leap.

Rob


-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Llamas <>
>Sent: Oct 5, 2010 9:53 AM
>To: 'Aviation discussion list for Mooney enthusiasts' <>
>Subject: RE: ray jay turbo vs m20 turbo
>
>I would only suggest a turbo-normalized or
>turbo-charged engine if you plan on using it regularly - as in high density
>altitude takeoffs and/or cruising well above 10,000' on a regular basis
>
>Rob:
>
>I do not disagree with anything you said regarding the longevity of the
>Lycoming in a turbo normalized application. I slightly disagree with your
>comment regarding flying over 10K. THE IMPLICATION IS WHY DO YOU WANT TO
>FLY OVER 10k.
>My flying has been on the eastern half of the US and my instruction was
>there also. The old wives tale was you do not need a turbo unless you are
>in the western part of the nation. After flying for over 20 years in the 6
>to 12 K altitudes and dealing with a lot of in route weather, I moved to a
>turbo and find 98% of the weather is below 14 to 17 K in the eastern part of
>the US. While I have had to circumnavigate towering cumulus, this happens
>very infrequently. I am amazed at how frequently I will be at 14K and ATC
>will say "showing heavy precip 10 miles at your 12 o'clock advise deviation
>request and as I look out the window there is absolutely nothing. It is
>below me.
>Joe Llamas 94FL Fort Myers KLUK Cincinnati
>
>
>

)

Bad bodyword models